How is statistical significance different from clinical significance?
I'll answer
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.20
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.
40more
40more
Harper Lee
Studied at the University of Melbourne, Lives in Melbourne, Australia.
As a statistical and clinical expert with extensive experience in interpreting medical data, I can provide a detailed explanation of the difference between statistical significance and clinical significance.
Statistical Significance refers to the probability that the observed results of a study are not due to chance. When we say that results are statistically significant, we mean that it is unlikely that the observed effect is simply a random occurrence. It is a measure of the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis, which is typically a statement of no effect or no difference. In clinical trials, a common threshold for statistical significance is a p-value of less than 0.05, which means that there is less than a 5% probability that the observed results occurred by chance.
However, statistical significance does not necessarily imply that the results are clinically significant. Clinical significance, also known as clinical importance, pertains to the practical relevance of the findings. It is about whether the observed effect is large enough to be meaningful in a real-world setting. For instance, a treatment might show a statistically significant difference compared to a placebo, but if the difference is so small that it does not improve patient outcomes or quality of life in a noticeable way, it may not be considered clinically significant.
To illustrate, imagine a study that compares a new drug to a standard treatment for a chronic condition. The study might find that the new drug is statistically superior to the standard treatment because the p-value is less than 0.05. But if the new drug only provides a marginal improvement in symptoms and comes with additional side effects or a higher cost, clinicians might not consider it a better option. The difference, while statistically significant, may not be clinically significant enough to change medical practice.
It's also important to note that statistical significance can be influenced by the size of the study. A very large study might find statistically significant results for a very small effect that is not clinically meaningful. Conversely, a smaller study might fail to find statistical significance for a larger effect that is clinically meaningful due to insufficient power.
In conclusion, while statistical significance is a crucial aspect of scientific research, it is only one part of the equation when it comes to evaluating the impact of a study's findings. Clinical significance is equally important, as it directly relates to the implications for patient care and medical decision-making.
Statistical Significance refers to the probability that the observed results of a study are not due to chance. When we say that results are statistically significant, we mean that it is unlikely that the observed effect is simply a random occurrence. It is a measure of the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis, which is typically a statement of no effect or no difference. In clinical trials, a common threshold for statistical significance is a p-value of less than 0.05, which means that there is less than a 5% probability that the observed results occurred by chance.
However, statistical significance does not necessarily imply that the results are clinically significant. Clinical significance, also known as clinical importance, pertains to the practical relevance of the findings. It is about whether the observed effect is large enough to be meaningful in a real-world setting. For instance, a treatment might show a statistically significant difference compared to a placebo, but if the difference is so small that it does not improve patient outcomes or quality of life in a noticeable way, it may not be considered clinically significant.
To illustrate, imagine a study that compares a new drug to a standard treatment for a chronic condition. The study might find that the new drug is statistically superior to the standard treatment because the p-value is less than 0.05. But if the new drug only provides a marginal improvement in symptoms and comes with additional side effects or a higher cost, clinicians might not consider it a better option. The difference, while statistically significant, may not be clinically significant enough to change medical practice.
It's also important to note that statistical significance can be influenced by the size of the study. A very large study might find statistically significant results for a very small effect that is not clinically meaningful. Conversely, a smaller study might fail to find statistical significance for a larger effect that is clinically meaningful due to insufficient power.
In conclusion, while statistical significance is a crucial aspect of scientific research, it is only one part of the equation when it comes to evaluating the impact of a study's findings. Clinical significance is equally important, as it directly relates to the implications for patient care and medical decision-making.
2024-04-18 05:08:45
reply(1)
Helpful(1122)
Helpful
Helpful(2)
Works at Facebook, Lives in Menlo Park. Graduated from Stanford University with a degree in Computer Science.
Results are said to be "statistically significant" if the probability that the result is compatible with the null hypothesis is very small. ... Clinical significance, or clinical importance: Is the difference between new and old therapy found in the study large enough for you to alter your practice?
2023-06-22 08:49:35
Penelope Baker
QuesHub.com delivers expert answers and knowledge to you.
Results are said to be "statistically significant" if the probability that the result is compatible with the null hypothesis is very small. ... Clinical significance, or clinical importance: Is the difference between new and old therapy found in the study large enough for you to alter your practice?
