What happens when P value is greater than alpha 2024?
I'll answer
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.20
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.
40more
40more
Savannah Hall
Studied at University of Florida, Lives in Gainesville, FL
As a statistician with a keen interest in data analysis and hypothesis testing, I often encounter questions about the interpretation of statistical results, particularly the significance of the p-value in relation to the alpha level. The p-value is a critical component in hypothesis testing, as it helps us determine whether the observed data is consistent with the null hypothesis or if there is enough evidence to suggest an alternative hypothesis.
When we perform a statistical test, we typically set an alpha level, often denoted as \( \alpha \), which is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. This is also known as the Type I error rate. Commonly used alpha levels are 0.05, 0.01, or 0.10, depending on the field of study and the consequences of making a Type I error.
The p-value, on the other hand, is the probability of observing the test statistic or something more extreme than what was actually observed, assuming the null hypothesis is true. It is a measure of the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis.
Now, when the p-value is greater than alpha, it means that the observed data is less extreme than what would be considered statistically significant at the chosen alpha level. In other words, we do not have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. This does not mean that the null hypothesis is true; rather, it means that the data is consistent with the null hypothesis, and we lack sufficient evidence to conclude otherwise.
It is important to note that failing to reject the null hypothesis does not imply that there is no effect or that the variables being studied are unrelated. It simply means that the test was not sensitive enough to detect an effect if one exists, or that the sample size was too small, or that the effect size is too small to be detected with the current level of statistical power.
Furthermore, when the p-value is greater than alpha, it is also crucial to consider the context of the study, the design of the experiment, and the potential for Type II errors (failing to reject a false null hypothesis). Researchers should also consider the practical significance of the results, even if they are not statistically significant. This involves looking at the effect size and its potential impact in the real world.
In summary, when the p-value is greater than the alpha level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the result is statistically nonsignificant. However, this does not necessarily mean that there is no effect or relationship between the variables. It is essential to consider the broader context of the study, the limitations of the statistical test, and the practical implications of the findings.
When we perform a statistical test, we typically set an alpha level, often denoted as \( \alpha \), which is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. This is also known as the Type I error rate. Commonly used alpha levels are 0.05, 0.01, or 0.10, depending on the field of study and the consequences of making a Type I error.
The p-value, on the other hand, is the probability of observing the test statistic or something more extreme than what was actually observed, assuming the null hypothesis is true. It is a measure of the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis.
Now, when the p-value is greater than alpha, it means that the observed data is less extreme than what would be considered statistically significant at the chosen alpha level. In other words, we do not have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. This does not mean that the null hypothesis is true; rather, it means that the data is consistent with the null hypothesis, and we lack sufficient evidence to conclude otherwise.
It is important to note that failing to reject the null hypothesis does not imply that there is no effect or that the variables being studied are unrelated. It simply means that the test was not sensitive enough to detect an effect if one exists, or that the sample size was too small, or that the effect size is too small to be detected with the current level of statistical power.
Furthermore, when the p-value is greater than alpha, it is also crucial to consider the context of the study, the design of the experiment, and the potential for Type II errors (failing to reject a false null hypothesis). Researchers should also consider the practical significance of the results, even if they are not statistically significant. This involves looking at the effect size and its potential impact in the real world.
In summary, when the p-value is greater than the alpha level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the result is statistically nonsignificant. However, this does not necessarily mean that there is no effect or relationship between the variables. It is essential to consider the broader context of the study, the limitations of the statistical test, and the practical implications of the findings.
2024-06-01 11:50:12
reply(1)
Helpful(1122)
Helpful
Helpful(2)
Works at Google, Lives in Mountain View. Holds a degree in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University.
If the p-value is less than or equal to the alpha (p< .05), then we reject the null hypothesis, and we say the result is statistically significant. If the p-value is greater than alpha (p > .05), then we fail to reject the null hypothesis, and we say that the result is statistically nonsignificant (n.s.).
2023-06-20 08:24:58
Sophia Moore
QuesHub.com delivers expert answers and knowledge to you.
If the p-value is less than or equal to the alpha (p< .05), then we reject the null hypothesis, and we say the result is statistically significant. If the p-value is greater than alpha (p > .05), then we fail to reject the null hypothesis, and we say that the result is statistically nonsignificant (n.s.).
