What does the P value have to be to be statistically significant?
I'll answer
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.20
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.
40more
40more
Lucas Gonzalez
Works at the International Development Association, Lives in Washington, D.C., USA.
As a statistical expert with a deep understanding of hypothesis testing and statistical significance, I can provide a comprehensive explanation of the concept of the P-value and its role in determining statistical significance.
In statistical hypothesis testing, the P-value is a measure of the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis. It is calculated based on the observed data and the assumptions of the statistical model. The P-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme as, or more extreme than, the one calculated from my sample data, assuming that the null hypothesis is true.
The determination of what constitutes a statistically significant P-value is somewhat arbitrary and is often a subject of debate among statisticians. However, there is a widely accepted convention that has been established over time. **A small P-value (typically ≤ 0.05) indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis**, leading to its rejection in favor of the alternative hypothesis. Conversely, **a large P-value (> 0.05) indicates weak evidence against the null hypothesis**, and as such, the null hypothesis is not rejected.
It's important to note that the 0.05 threshold is a convention and not an absolute rule. Different fields of study may use different significance levels such as 0.01 or 0.10, depending on the context and the seriousness of making a Type I error (false positive) or Type II error (false negative). For instance, in life-threatening medical trials, a more stringent level like 0.01 might be used to minimize the risk of approving an ineffective treatment.
The P-value should not be interpreted as the probability that the null hypothesis is true or the probability that the alternative hypothesis is true. Instead, it is the probability of observing the data given that the null hypothesis is true. A P-value does not measure the size of the effect or the importance of the result; it only indicates how incompatible the data are with the null hypothesis.
Moreover, the use of P-values has been criticized for leading to misinterpretations. Some argue that focusing solely on whether a P-value is below or above a certain threshold can lead to a misunderstanding of the evidence. As an alternative, researchers are encouraged to report confidence intervals and effect sizes to provide a more complete picture of the results.
In conclusion, while the P-value is a critical component of hypothesis testing, it is only one piece of the puzzle. It is essential to consider the context, the design of the study, the size of the effect, and the potential consequences of Type I and Type II errors when interpreting the results of a statistical analysis.
In statistical hypothesis testing, the P-value is a measure of the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis. It is calculated based on the observed data and the assumptions of the statistical model. The P-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme as, or more extreme than, the one calculated from my sample data, assuming that the null hypothesis is true.
The determination of what constitutes a statistically significant P-value is somewhat arbitrary and is often a subject of debate among statisticians. However, there is a widely accepted convention that has been established over time. **A small P-value (typically ≤ 0.05) indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis**, leading to its rejection in favor of the alternative hypothesis. Conversely, **a large P-value (> 0.05) indicates weak evidence against the null hypothesis**, and as such, the null hypothesis is not rejected.
It's important to note that the 0.05 threshold is a convention and not an absolute rule. Different fields of study may use different significance levels such as 0.01 or 0.10, depending on the context and the seriousness of making a Type I error (false positive) or Type II error (false negative). For instance, in life-threatening medical trials, a more stringent level like 0.01 might be used to minimize the risk of approving an ineffective treatment.
The P-value should not be interpreted as the probability that the null hypothesis is true or the probability that the alternative hypothesis is true. Instead, it is the probability of observing the data given that the null hypothesis is true. A P-value does not measure the size of the effect or the importance of the result; it only indicates how incompatible the data are with the null hypothesis.
Moreover, the use of P-values has been criticized for leading to misinterpretations. Some argue that focusing solely on whether a P-value is below or above a certain threshold can lead to a misunderstanding of the evidence. As an alternative, researchers are encouraged to report confidence intervals and effect sizes to provide a more complete picture of the results.
In conclusion, while the P-value is a critical component of hypothesis testing, it is only one piece of the puzzle. It is essential to consider the context, the design of the study, the size of the effect, and the potential consequences of Type I and Type II errors when interpreting the results of a statistical analysis.
2024-04-18 23:28:25
reply(1)
Helpful(1122)
Helpful
Helpful(2)
Works at the International Air Transport Association, Lives in Montreal, Canada.
A small p-value (typically -- 0.05) indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis, so you reject the null hypothesis. A large p-value (> 0.05) indicates weak evidence against the null hypothesis, so you fail to reject the null hypothesis.
2023-06-18 08:16:56
Charlotte Gonzales
QuesHub.com delivers expert answers and knowledge to you.
A small p-value (typically -- 0.05) indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis, so you reject the null hypothesis. A large p-value (> 0.05) indicates weak evidence against the null hypothesis, so you fail to reject the null hypothesis.
