What does it mean that the results are not statistically significant for this study?
I'll answer
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.20
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.
40more
40more
Emma Foster
Studied at Stanford University, Lives in Palo Alto. Entrepreneur with a focus on developing educational technology solutions.
As a statistical expert with extensive experience in data analysis and interpretation, I can provide a comprehensive explanation of what it means when the results of a study are not statistically significant.
In the realm of statistics, a study's results are considered statistically significant if they are unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. This is a crucial aspect of scientific research, as it helps researchers determine whether the observed effects or differences are real and not due to random variation.
When we say that the results are not statistically significant, it means that the observed differences or effects could be due to random chance. In other words, if the null hypothesis were true (which states that there is no effect or no difference), the probability of obtaining a result as extreme as the one observed is relatively high. This high probability suggests that the observed effect is not strong enough to conclude that it is not due to chance.
The concept of statistical significance is closely tied to the p-value, which is the probability of observing the data (or more extreme data) given that the null hypothesis is true. A common threshold for statistical significance is a p-value of less than 0.05, which means that there is less than a 5% chance that the observed results are due to random chance. If the p-value is higher than this threshold, the results are deemed not statistically significant.
It's important to note that statistical significance does not necessarily imply practical significance. A result may be statistically significant but have little to no real-world impact or relevance. Conversely, a result may not be statistically significant but still have important practical implications.
Moreover, the concept of statistical significance is not a measure of the truth or falsehood of a hypothesis. It is a measure of the evidence against the null hypothesis. A statistically non-significant result does not prove that the null hypothesis is true; it simply indicates that there is not enough evidence to reject it.
In summary, when the results of a study are not statistically significant, it suggests that the observed effects or differences could be due to random chance, and there is not enough evidence to confidently conclude that they are not. This does not mean that the study was without value; it may provide valuable insights that can inform future research or suggest areas for further investigation.
In the realm of statistics, a study's results are considered statistically significant if they are unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. This is a crucial aspect of scientific research, as it helps researchers determine whether the observed effects or differences are real and not due to random variation.
When we say that the results are not statistically significant, it means that the observed differences or effects could be due to random chance. In other words, if the null hypothesis were true (which states that there is no effect or no difference), the probability of obtaining a result as extreme as the one observed is relatively high. This high probability suggests that the observed effect is not strong enough to conclude that it is not due to chance.
The concept of statistical significance is closely tied to the p-value, which is the probability of observing the data (or more extreme data) given that the null hypothesis is true. A common threshold for statistical significance is a p-value of less than 0.05, which means that there is less than a 5% chance that the observed results are due to random chance. If the p-value is higher than this threshold, the results are deemed not statistically significant.
It's important to note that statistical significance does not necessarily imply practical significance. A result may be statistically significant but have little to no real-world impact or relevance. Conversely, a result may not be statistically significant but still have important practical implications.
Moreover, the concept of statistical significance is not a measure of the truth or falsehood of a hypothesis. It is a measure of the evidence against the null hypothesis. A statistically non-significant result does not prove that the null hypothesis is true; it simply indicates that there is not enough evidence to reject it.
In summary, when the results of a study are not statistically significant, it suggests that the observed effects or differences could be due to random chance, and there is not enough evidence to confidently conclude that they are not. This does not mean that the study was without value; it may provide valuable insights that can inform future research or suggest areas for further investigation.
2024-04-17 22:59:30
reply(1)
Helpful(1122)
Helpful
Helpful(2)
Works at the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), Lives in Lyon, France.
Not Due to Chance. In principle, a statistically significant result (usually a difference) is a result that's not attributed to chance. More technically, it means that if the Null Hypothesis is true (which means there really is no difference), there's a low probability of getting a result that large or larger.Oct 21, 2014
2023-06-20 07:44:26
Ava Jackson
QuesHub.com delivers expert answers and knowledge to you.
Not Due to Chance. In principle, a statistically significant result (usually a difference) is a result that's not attributed to chance. More technically, it means that if the Null Hypothesis is true (which means there really is no difference), there's a low probability of getting a result that large or larger.Oct 21, 2014
