What ended the civil war in Sudan 2024?
I'll answer
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.20
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.
40more
40more
Zoe Morris
Studied at the University of British Columbia, Lives in Vancouver, Canada.
As a subject matter expert in international relations with a focus on African conflicts, I can provide a comprehensive analysis of the factors that contributed to the end of the civil war in Sudan. The Second Sudanese Civil War, which lasted from 1983 to 2005, was one of the longest and most devastating conflicts in modern history. It was a complex war with multiple causes, including ethnic tensions, religious differences, political power struggles, and economic competition over resources.
The conflict was primarily between the predominantly Muslim, Arabic-speaking government of Sudan, led by the National Congress Party (NCP), and the predominantly Christian and animist southern Sudanese, represented by the Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA). The SPLA fought for greater autonomy and self-determination for the people of Southern Sudan.
Several key factors contributed to the end of the civil war:
1. Peace Negotiations: The Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) was signed on January 9, 2005, in Nairobi, Kenya. This agreement was the culmination of years of negotiations and was facilitated by the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), a regional bloc of East African countries. The CPA included provisions for a six-year interim period of power-sharing between the north and the south, followed by a referendum on independence for Southern Sudan.
2. International Pressure: The international community played a significant role in applying diplomatic and economic pressure on the Sudanese government to come to the negotiating table. The United States, in particular, imposed sanctions on Sudan and provided support to the SPLA, which helped to bring the government to the negotiating table.
3. Internal Dynamics: Within Sudan, there were shifts in the political landscape that contributed to the end of the war. The government faced internal divisions and the SPLA itself underwent changes in leadership and strategy. These internal dynamics made both sides more amenable to finding a peaceful resolution.
4. Economic Factors: The economic strain of the prolonged conflict was a significant factor. Both sides realized that the war was economically unsustainable and that peace was necessary for economic development and stability.
5. Humanitarian Crisis: The war led to a severe humanitarian crisis, with millions of people displaced and a significant loss of life. The international community's response to this crisis put additional pressure on both parties to seek a peaceful resolution.
6. Regional Influences: Neighboring countries and regional powers also played a role in facilitating the peace process. Their interests in regional stability and economic development in the region contributed to their support for the peace negotiations.
7.
The Role of the SPLA: The SPLA's military successes and its ability to maintain control over large areas of Southern Sudan gave it a strong position in the negotiations, which was crucial in achieving the CPA.
8.
The Referendum: The CPA also included a provision for a referendum on self-determination for Southern Sudan, which took place in January 2011. The overwhelming vote for independence by the people of Southern Sudan was a direct result of the CPA and marked the end of the civil war.
While the CPA did bring an end to the civil war, it did not resolve all the underlying issues that led to the conflict. The period following the CPA saw continued tensions and conflicts, particularly in the regions of Darfur and South Kordofan. However, the signing of the CPA was a significant milestone in the history of Sudan and marked the end of Africa's longest-running civil war.
The conflict was primarily between the predominantly Muslim, Arabic-speaking government of Sudan, led by the National Congress Party (NCP), and the predominantly Christian and animist southern Sudanese, represented by the Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA). The SPLA fought for greater autonomy and self-determination for the people of Southern Sudan.
Several key factors contributed to the end of the civil war:
1. Peace Negotiations: The Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) was signed on January 9, 2005, in Nairobi, Kenya. This agreement was the culmination of years of negotiations and was facilitated by the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), a regional bloc of East African countries. The CPA included provisions for a six-year interim period of power-sharing between the north and the south, followed by a referendum on independence for Southern Sudan.
2. International Pressure: The international community played a significant role in applying diplomatic and economic pressure on the Sudanese government to come to the negotiating table. The United States, in particular, imposed sanctions on Sudan and provided support to the SPLA, which helped to bring the government to the negotiating table.
3. Internal Dynamics: Within Sudan, there were shifts in the political landscape that contributed to the end of the war. The government faced internal divisions and the SPLA itself underwent changes in leadership and strategy. These internal dynamics made both sides more amenable to finding a peaceful resolution.
4. Economic Factors: The economic strain of the prolonged conflict was a significant factor. Both sides realized that the war was economically unsustainable and that peace was necessary for economic development and stability.
5. Humanitarian Crisis: The war led to a severe humanitarian crisis, with millions of people displaced and a significant loss of life. The international community's response to this crisis put additional pressure on both parties to seek a peaceful resolution.
6. Regional Influences: Neighboring countries and regional powers also played a role in facilitating the peace process. Their interests in regional stability and economic development in the region contributed to their support for the peace negotiations.
7.
The Role of the SPLA: The SPLA's military successes and its ability to maintain control over large areas of Southern Sudan gave it a strong position in the negotiations, which was crucial in achieving the CPA.
8.
The Referendum: The CPA also included a provision for a referendum on self-determination for Southern Sudan, which took place in January 2011. The overwhelming vote for independence by the people of Southern Sudan was a direct result of the CPA and marked the end of the civil war.
While the CPA did bring an end to the civil war, it did not resolve all the underlying issues that led to the conflict. The period following the CPA saw continued tensions and conflicts, particularly in the regions of Darfur and South Kordofan. However, the signing of the CPA was a significant milestone in the history of Sudan and marked the end of Africa's longest-running civil war.
2024-06-15 16:11:25
reply(1)
Helpful(1122)
Helpful
Helpful(2)
Studied at the University of Tokyo, Lives in Tokyo, Japan.
1983 -C 2005Second Sudanese Civil War/PeriodsSearch for: What ended the civil war in Sudan?
2023-06-21 18:33:21
Alexander Thompson
QuesHub.com delivers expert answers and knowledge to you.
1983 -C 2005Second Sudanese Civil War/PeriodsSearch for: What ended the civil war in Sudan?
