Is the word smarter grammatically correct?
I'll answer
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.20
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.
40more
40more
Noah Scott
Works at Amazon, Lives in Seattle, WA
As a language expert with a deep understanding of English grammar and usage, I'm here to help clarify the nuances of the English language. Let's delve into the question of whether the word "smarter" is grammatically correct in a given context.
The use of the word "smarter" is indeed grammatically correct, but its correctness is contingent upon the context in which it is used. "Smarter" is the comparative form of the adjective "smart," which means having or showing a quick-witted intelligence. When we use "smarter," we are typically comparing the intelligence, wit, or cleverness of one entity with another.
For instance, in a sentence like "She is smarter than her sister," the word "smarter" is used correctly to indicate that she possesses a greater degree of intelligence or wit in comparison to her sister. However, without context, it's challenging to ascertain the correctness of "smarter" because the comparative form inherently requires a point of comparison.
The reference content you provided touches on an important aspect of comparative adjectives. It suggests that the second use of "smarter" is referring back to the first use, which is also "smarter." This is a bit of a conundrum because for "smarter" to have meaning, we need to understand the context of its first use. If the first use is unclear, then the second use will also be ambiguous.
Let's consider an example to illustrate this point:
1. "He is smarter than his classmates."
2. "His intelligence is even smarter than we thought."
In the first sentence, "smarter" is used correctly to compare his intelligence to that of his classmates. However, in the second sentence, without knowing what "smarter" was referring to in the first sentence, the use of "smarter" again becomes unclear. We need to know what aspect of his intelligence is being compared to what to understand the meaning fully.
It's also worth noting that the use of comparative forms can sometimes lead to redundancy or confusion. For example, if we were to say, "She is smarter than anyone smarter in the room," the sentence becomes somewhat redundant and confusing because it uses "smarter" twice without clear reference points for the comparison.
In conclusion, while "smarter" is a grammatically correct comparative form of the adjective "smart," its appropriateness and clarity depend on the context in which it is used. It requires a clear point of comparison to convey a meaningful message effectively. When crafting sentences with comparative adjectives, it's crucial to ensure that the comparison is logical and that the reader or listener can easily understand what is being compared and to what.
The use of the word "smarter" is indeed grammatically correct, but its correctness is contingent upon the context in which it is used. "Smarter" is the comparative form of the adjective "smart," which means having or showing a quick-witted intelligence. When we use "smarter," we are typically comparing the intelligence, wit, or cleverness of one entity with another.
For instance, in a sentence like "She is smarter than her sister," the word "smarter" is used correctly to indicate that she possesses a greater degree of intelligence or wit in comparison to her sister. However, without context, it's challenging to ascertain the correctness of "smarter" because the comparative form inherently requires a point of comparison.
The reference content you provided touches on an important aspect of comparative adjectives. It suggests that the second use of "smarter" is referring back to the first use, which is also "smarter." This is a bit of a conundrum because for "smarter" to have meaning, we need to understand the context of its first use. If the first use is unclear, then the second use will also be ambiguous.
Let's consider an example to illustrate this point:
1. "He is smarter than his classmates."
2. "His intelligence is even smarter than we thought."
In the first sentence, "smarter" is used correctly to compare his intelligence to that of his classmates. However, in the second sentence, without knowing what "smarter" was referring to in the first sentence, the use of "smarter" again becomes unclear. We need to know what aspect of his intelligence is being compared to what to understand the meaning fully.
It's also worth noting that the use of comparative forms can sometimes lead to redundancy or confusion. For example, if we were to say, "She is smarter than anyone smarter in the room," the sentence becomes somewhat redundant and confusing because it uses "smarter" twice without clear reference points for the comparison.
In conclusion, while "smarter" is a grammatically correct comparative form of the adjective "smart," its appropriateness and clarity depend on the context in which it is used. It requires a clear point of comparison to convey a meaningful message effectively. When crafting sentences with comparative adjectives, it's crucial to ensure that the comparison is logical and that the reader or listener can easily understand what is being compared and to what.
2024-05-10 21:32:05
reply(1)
Helpful(1122)
Helpful
Helpful(2)
Studied at University of Oxford, Lives in Oxford, UK
The second adjective, --smarter,-- refers back comparatively to the first adjective, which is also the word --smarter.-- To have any meaning, you'd have to know what was meant by --smarter-- the first time it was used in the sentence. However, there's no clue about that either.Jun 8, 2017
2023-06-17 03:12:01
Julian Morris
QuesHub.com delivers expert answers and knowledge to you.
The second adjective, --smarter,-- refers back comparatively to the first adjective, which is also the word --smarter.-- To have any meaning, you'd have to know what was meant by --smarter-- the first time it was used in the sentence. However, there's no clue about that either.Jun 8, 2017
