Who came up with the free will Defence?
I'll answer
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.20
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.
40more
40more
Amelia Kim
Studied at the University of Seoul, Lives in Seoul, South Korea.
As a domain expert in philosophy, particularly in the area of theodicy and metaphysical ethics, I am well-versed in the various arguments and theories that have been put forth to address the problem of evil and the existence of God. One of the most influential and widely-discussed responses to this problem is the "free will defense," which I will elaborate on in detail.
The free will defense is a philosophical argument that seeks to reconcile the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God with the presence of evil in the world. It posits that God has created free beings with the ability to make their own choices, and that the existence of evil is a necessary consequence of this freedom. The argument is not that evil is good or that it is God's will, but rather that it is a byproduct of the greater good of free will.
The free will defense was most notably developed by Alvin Plantinga, an American analytic philosopher. Plantinga is the John A. O'Brien Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at the University of Notre Dame. His work on the free will defense gained prominence with its publication in his 1974 paper "God, Evil, and the Nature of Necessity" and was further refined in his 1977 book "God, Freedom, and Evil".
In his argument, Plantinga distinguishes between two types of goods: natural goods and moral goods. Natural goods are those that are good by their very nature, such as knowledge, pleasure, and consciousness. Moral goods, on the other hand, are those that are good because they are freely chosen, such as acts of kindness, generosity, and love. Plantinga argues that moral goods are more valuable than natural goods because they involve the exercise of free will, which is a central aspect of human nature and a reflection of God's image.
The existence of evil, according to Plantinga, is not incompatible with the existence of a good God because evil is a result of the misuse of free will. When free beings choose to act against moral good, they bring about evil. However, the absence of evil would necessitate the absence of free will, which would be a greater evil, as it would mean the loss of the capacity for moral good.
Plantinga's free will defense is not without its critics. Some argue that it does not adequately address the problem of natural evil, such as the suffering caused by natural disasters or diseases. Others question whether the existence of free will can justify the amount and severity of evil in the world. Despite these criticisms, the free will defense remains a significant contribution to the philosophical discourse on the problem of evil and has been influential in shaping subsequent discussions.
In conclusion, the free will defense is a complex and nuanced argument that has had a profound impact on the debate surrounding the existence of evil and the nature of God. Alvin Plantinga's work on this topic has provided a framework for understanding the relationship between free will, evil, and divine attributes, and it continues to be a subject of rigorous examination and debate within the philosophical community.
The free will defense is a philosophical argument that seeks to reconcile the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God with the presence of evil in the world. It posits that God has created free beings with the ability to make their own choices, and that the existence of evil is a necessary consequence of this freedom. The argument is not that evil is good or that it is God's will, but rather that it is a byproduct of the greater good of free will.
The free will defense was most notably developed by Alvin Plantinga, an American analytic philosopher. Plantinga is the John A. O'Brien Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at the University of Notre Dame. His work on the free will defense gained prominence with its publication in his 1974 paper "God, Evil, and the Nature of Necessity" and was further refined in his 1977 book "God, Freedom, and Evil".
In his argument, Plantinga distinguishes between two types of goods: natural goods and moral goods. Natural goods are those that are good by their very nature, such as knowledge, pleasure, and consciousness. Moral goods, on the other hand, are those that are good because they are freely chosen, such as acts of kindness, generosity, and love. Plantinga argues that moral goods are more valuable than natural goods because they involve the exercise of free will, which is a central aspect of human nature and a reflection of God's image.
The existence of evil, according to Plantinga, is not incompatible with the existence of a good God because evil is a result of the misuse of free will. When free beings choose to act against moral good, they bring about evil. However, the absence of evil would necessitate the absence of free will, which would be a greater evil, as it would mean the loss of the capacity for moral good.
Plantinga's free will defense is not without its critics. Some argue that it does not adequately address the problem of natural evil, such as the suffering caused by natural disasters or diseases. Others question whether the existence of free will can justify the amount and severity of evil in the world. Despite these criticisms, the free will defense remains a significant contribution to the philosophical discourse on the problem of evil and has been influential in shaping subsequent discussions.
In conclusion, the free will defense is a complex and nuanced argument that has had a profound impact on the debate surrounding the existence of evil and the nature of God. Alvin Plantinga's work on this topic has provided a framework for understanding the relationship between free will, evil, and divine attributes, and it continues to be a subject of rigorous examination and debate within the philosophical community.
2024-05-06 18:20:48
reply(1)
Helpful(1122)
Helpful
Helpful(2)
Studied at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Lives in Los Angeles. Passionate about environmental sustainability and currently working for a green energy startup.
Alvin Plantinga's free will defense is a logical argument developed by American analytic philosopher Alvin Plantinga, the John A. O'Brien Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at the University of Notre Dame, and published in its final version in his 1977 book God, Freedom, and Evil.
2023-06-13 20:47:57
Zoe Reyes
QuesHub.com delivers expert answers and knowledge to you.
Alvin Plantinga's free will defense is a logical argument developed by American analytic philosopher Alvin Plantinga, the John A. O'Brien Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at the University of Notre Dame, and published in its final version in his 1977 book God, Freedom, and Evil.
