Why was there no leap year in 1900?
I'll answer
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.20
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.
40more
40more
Works at the International Renewable Energy Agency, Lives in Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Putting all of these rules together, you can see that a year is a leap year not only if it is divisible by 4, it also has to be divisible by 400 if it is a centurial year. So 1700, 1800 and 1900 were not leap years, but 1600 and 2000 was.
2023-06-15 18:02:33
评论(499)
Helpful(122)
Helpful
Helpful(2)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/619b5/619b543b644c0ff38885a726ee6bd77358f9bf37" alt=""
Harper Ramirez
QuesHub.com delivers expert answers and knowledge to you.
Putting all of these rules together, you can see that a year is a leap year not only if it is divisible by 4, it also has to be divisible by 400 if it is a centurial year. So 1700, 1800 and 1900 were not leap years, but 1600 and 2000 was.