What are the problems of the method 2024?
I'll answer
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.20
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.
40more
40more
Gabriel Hughes
Works at Amazon, Lives in Seattle. Graduated from University of Washington with a degree in Business Administration.
As a domain expert in educational methodologies, I've observed that while the method of assigning problems for students to solve using course materials and discussing the solutions in class has its merits, it is not without its challenges. Here are some of the potential issues associated with this method:
1. Lack of Real-World Application: Students may find it difficult to apply theoretical knowledge to real-world scenarios. The abstract nature of problems can sometimes disconnect students from the practical implications of their learning.
2. Overreliance on Course Materials: If students rely solely on course materials, they might not develop the skills necessary to conduct independent research or find and evaluate information from a variety of sources.
3. Homogenization of Thought: When solutions are discussed in class, there is a risk that the instructor's perspective or the majority opinion could overshadow individual thought processes and creative problem-solving approaches.
4. Inadequate Preparation for Research: While this method can be useful for teaching research design, it may not fully prepare students for the complexities and uncertainties inherent in actual research work.
5. Assessment Limitations: The method may not effectively assess a student's ability to think critically and solve problems independently, as the class discussion can influence their final understanding and solution.
6. Student Engagement: Not all students may actively participate in class discussions, which could limit their learning experience and hinder the development of critical thinking skills.
7.
Time Constraints: In-class discussions can be time-consuming, and not all problems may receive the attention they deserve, especially in large classes.
8. **Dependence on Instructor's Expertise**: The effectiveness of this method is heavily dependent on the instructor's ability to guide discussions and provide accurate feedback.
9.
Potential for Groupthink: Group discussions can sometimes lead to conformity, where students may be less likely to challenge the status quo or consider alternative viewpoints.
10. **Difficulty in Assessing Individual Contribution**: It can be challenging to evaluate each student's contribution to the group's solution, especially when the discussion is not structured effectively.
Now, let's move on to the translation.
1. Lack of Real-World Application: Students may find it difficult to apply theoretical knowledge to real-world scenarios. The abstract nature of problems can sometimes disconnect students from the practical implications of their learning.
2. Overreliance on Course Materials: If students rely solely on course materials, they might not develop the skills necessary to conduct independent research or find and evaluate information from a variety of sources.
3. Homogenization of Thought: When solutions are discussed in class, there is a risk that the instructor's perspective or the majority opinion could overshadow individual thought processes and creative problem-solving approaches.
4. Inadequate Preparation for Research: While this method can be useful for teaching research design, it may not fully prepare students for the complexities and uncertainties inherent in actual research work.
5. Assessment Limitations: The method may not effectively assess a student's ability to think critically and solve problems independently, as the class discussion can influence their final understanding and solution.
6. Student Engagement: Not all students may actively participate in class discussions, which could limit their learning experience and hinder the development of critical thinking skills.
7.
Time Constraints: In-class discussions can be time-consuming, and not all problems may receive the attention they deserve, especially in large classes.
8. **Dependence on Instructor's Expertise**: The effectiveness of this method is heavily dependent on the instructor's ability to guide discussions and provide accurate feedback.
9.
Potential for Groupthink: Group discussions can sometimes lead to conformity, where students may be less likely to challenge the status quo or consider alternative viewpoints.
10. **Difficulty in Assessing Individual Contribution**: It can be challenging to evaluate each student's contribution to the group's solution, especially when the discussion is not structured effectively.
Now, let's move on to the translation.
2024-06-16 19:50:00
reply(1)
Helpful(1122)
Helpful
Helpful(2)
Studied at the University of Tokyo, Lives in Tokyo, Japan.
Problems are assigned in advance, students use course material to solve the problem, and the solutions are discussed in class. This method is particularly applicable to courses in research methods because research design is a classic ill-defined task, and it serves as a vehicle for teaching critical thinking.
2023-06-11 06:06:34
Benjamin Brown
QuesHub.com delivers expert answers and knowledge to you.
Problems are assigned in advance, students use course material to solve the problem, and the solutions are discussed in class. This method is particularly applicable to courses in research methods because research design is a classic ill-defined task, and it serves as a vehicle for teaching critical thinking.
