Is a pair of shoes singular or plural 2024?
I'll answer
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.20
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.
40more
40more
Oliver Wilson
Works at the International Finance Corporation, Lives in Washington, D.C., USA.
As a linguistic expert with a deep understanding of the intricacies of the English language, I'm often asked about the usage of certain phrases and their grammatical correctness. The question of whether a pair of shoes should be referred to in the singular or plural form is a fascinating one, and it touches on the subtleties of English grammar and usage.
In English, the term "pair" is indeed a singular noun when it refers to two items that are considered together as a single unit. For example, when we talk about a pair of scissors, we are referring to the two blades that function as one tool. The same logic applies to a pair of shoes; we are considering the two shoes as one set or unit, even though there are two individual items involved.
However, the verb agreement with "pair" can be a bit tricky. Traditionally, when "pair" is used as a singular noun to denote a set of two items, the verb that follows should also be in the singular form. So, one might say, "A pair *was* given to me as a gift," adhering to the prescriptive grammar rules.
On the other hand, in everyday conversation, many speakers of English tend to use the plural form of the verb when referring to a pair of items, especially when the items are animate or when the action associated with the pair seems to affect each item individually. This is likely due to the fact that the items in the pair are distinct and can be thought of as separate entities. For example, "The pair *were* arguing" might be used to describe two people who are part of a couple.
The reference to the discussion on June 28, 2011, highlights an interesting perspective on this matter. It suggests that while the prescriptive rule would dictate the use of "was" with "pair," the more colloquial and perhaps more widely accepted usage in modern English might lean towards "were," reflecting a shift in language that is not uncommon as it evolves.
In conclusion, the use of singular or plural verbs with "pair" is a matter of style and context. In formal writing or when adhering to strict grammatical rules, "was" is the correct choice. However, in casual speech or when the context suggests individual actions or characteristics of the items in the pair, "were" might be more appropriate. It's a testament to the flexibility and adaptability of the English language.
In English, the term "pair" is indeed a singular noun when it refers to two items that are considered together as a single unit. For example, when we talk about a pair of scissors, we are referring to the two blades that function as one tool. The same logic applies to a pair of shoes; we are considering the two shoes as one set or unit, even though there are two individual items involved.
However, the verb agreement with "pair" can be a bit tricky. Traditionally, when "pair" is used as a singular noun to denote a set of two items, the verb that follows should also be in the singular form. So, one might say, "A pair *was* given to me as a gift," adhering to the prescriptive grammar rules.
On the other hand, in everyday conversation, many speakers of English tend to use the plural form of the verb when referring to a pair of items, especially when the items are animate or when the action associated with the pair seems to affect each item individually. This is likely due to the fact that the items in the pair are distinct and can be thought of as separate entities. For example, "The pair *were* arguing" might be used to describe two people who are part of a couple.
The reference to the discussion on June 28, 2011, highlights an interesting perspective on this matter. It suggests that while the prescriptive rule would dictate the use of "was" with "pair," the more colloquial and perhaps more widely accepted usage in modern English might lean towards "were," reflecting a shift in language that is not uncommon as it evolves.
In conclusion, the use of singular or plural verbs with "pair" is a matter of style and context. In formal writing or when adhering to strict grammatical rules, "was" is the correct choice. However, in casual speech or when the context suggests individual actions or characteristics of the items in the pair, "were" might be more appropriate. It's a testament to the flexibility and adaptability of the English language.
2024-06-16 17:26:09
reply(1)
Helpful(1122)
Helpful
Helpful(2)
Studied at the University of Edinburgh, Lives in Edinburgh, Scotland.
From a prescriptive point of view, since pair is a singular noun, referring to two things (while pairs is the plural form of that noun), pair was is the correct way to say it: Hence: A pair was... However, since the world is not composed of pedants, your proposition (the pair were...) is no less correct.Jun 28, 2011
2023-06-13 06:05:28
Lucas Rivera
QuesHub.com delivers expert answers and knowledge to you.
From a prescriptive point of view, since pair is a singular noun, referring to two things (while pairs is the plural form of that noun), pair was is the correct way to say it: Hence: A pair was... However, since the world is not composed of pedants, your proposition (the pair were...) is no less correct.Jun 28, 2011
