What is proof of verbosity?
I'll answer
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.20
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.
40more
40more
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33bdf/33bdf2d8d8268b28338055707d8b90d0cd327eb8" alt=""
Lucas Lee
Works at the International Air Transport Association, Lives in Montreal, Canada.
As an expert in the field of logic and argumentation, I often encounter various forms of reasoning and rhetorical strategies. One such strategy that can be quite challenging to deal with is what is known as "proof of verbosity." This term refers to a type of argument that is intentionally made overly complex, convoluted, or excessively wordy to the point where it becomes difficult to address or refute. The goal of such an argument is often to intimidate the listener or reader, or to obscure the truth through a cloud of words.
Definition:
The term "proof of verbosity" is not a formal term in logic, but it is a useful concept for understanding certain types of arguments. It is sometimes also referred to as "argumentum verbosium" or "proof by intimidation." This type of argument is characterized by its length and complexity, which are used as a form of intimidation or distraction rather than a genuine attempt to persuade through reason.
Example:
Consider a scenario where a debater, instead of presenting a clear and concise argument, opts to use a barrage of technical jargon, convoluted sentences, and unnecessary details. This can make it difficult for the audience to follow the argument, let alone critique it. The verbosity serves as a shield, protecting the argument from scrutiny because the audience may feel overwhelmed or intimidated by the sheer volume of information.
**When an argument is presented that is too complex, obtuse or verbose to reasonably deal with:**
In these situations, it is crucial to maintain clarity and simplicity. One should strive to distill the argument down to its core components and question the necessity of each element. If an argument cannot be simplified, it may be a sign that the argument is not being made in good faith.
**Insomuch as it remains within our agency, it behooves us to eschew obfuscation, and espouse elucidation:**
It is important to avoid deliberately making arguments more complicated than they need to be. Instead, we should aim for clarity and simplicity. This not only makes our arguments more accessible to others but also strengthens them by making it more difficult for them to be misinterpreted or misunderstood.
**Also known as: argumentum verbosium / proof by intimidation:**
While "proof of verbosity" is a term that captures the essence of this type of argument, it is not the only name for it. "Argumentum verbosium" is a Latin term that translates to "argument by verbosity," and "proof by intimidation" refers to the use of excessive complexity to intimidate the listener or reader.
In conclusion, dealing with "proof of verbosity" requires a commitment to simplicity and clarity. It is essential to resist the temptation to obscure the truth with a flurry of words and instead focus on presenting a clear and concise argument that can be easily understood and evaluated.
Definition:
The term "proof of verbosity" is not a formal term in logic, but it is a useful concept for understanding certain types of arguments. It is sometimes also referred to as "argumentum verbosium" or "proof by intimidation." This type of argument is characterized by its length and complexity, which are used as a form of intimidation or distraction rather than a genuine attempt to persuade through reason.
Example:
Consider a scenario where a debater, instead of presenting a clear and concise argument, opts to use a barrage of technical jargon, convoluted sentences, and unnecessary details. This can make it difficult for the audience to follow the argument, let alone critique it. The verbosity serves as a shield, protecting the argument from scrutiny because the audience may feel overwhelmed or intimidated by the sheer volume of information.
**When an argument is presented that is too complex, obtuse or verbose to reasonably deal with:**
In these situations, it is crucial to maintain clarity and simplicity. One should strive to distill the argument down to its core components and question the necessity of each element. If an argument cannot be simplified, it may be a sign that the argument is not being made in good faith.
**Insomuch as it remains within our agency, it behooves us to eschew obfuscation, and espouse elucidation:**
It is important to avoid deliberately making arguments more complicated than they need to be. Instead, we should aim for clarity and simplicity. This not only makes our arguments more accessible to others but also strengthens them by making it more difficult for them to be misinterpreted or misunderstood.
**Also known as: argumentum verbosium / proof by intimidation:**
While "proof of verbosity" is a term that captures the essence of this type of argument, it is not the only name for it. "Argumentum verbosium" is a Latin term that translates to "argument by verbosity," and "proof by intimidation" refers to the use of excessive complexity to intimidate the listener or reader.
In conclusion, dealing with "proof of verbosity" requires a commitment to simplicity and clarity. It is essential to resist the temptation to obscure the truth with a flurry of words and instead focus on presenting a clear and concise argument that can be easily understood and evaluated.
2024-05-12 13:40:53
reply(1)
Helpful(1122)
Helpful
Helpful(2)
Works at the International Development Association, Lives in Washington, D.C., USA.
Definition. Example. When an argument is presented that is too complex, obtuse or verbose to reasonably deal with. Insomuch as it remains within our agency, it behooves us to eschew obfuscation, and espouse elucidation. Also known as: argumentum verbosium / proof by intimidation.
2023-06-19 05:18:29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecfac/ecfac25140567df43447883c381a0cf53d5753fd" alt=""
Scarlett Lee
QuesHub.com delivers expert answers and knowledge to you.
Definition. Example. When an argument is presented that is too complex, obtuse or verbose to reasonably deal with. Insomuch as it remains within our agency, it behooves us to eschew obfuscation, and espouse elucidation. Also known as: argumentum verbosium / proof by intimidation.