Is this correct children's?

Lucas Lee | 2023-06-09 00:06:32 | page views:1701
I'll answer
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.20 Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.
40more

Ava Garcia

Studied at Harvard University, Lives in Cambridge, MA
As an expert in linguistics and the English language, I can provide a comprehensive explanation regarding the possessive forms of plural nouns, specifically addressing the examples you've provided: "children" and "parents."
Firstly, let's clarify the distinction between regular and irregular plurals. Regular plurals are formed by adding an "s" or "es" to the end of the singular noun. For instance, "cat" becomes "cats," and "box" becomes "boxes." Irregular plurals, on the other hand, do not follow this pattern and have unique forms that must be memorized, such as "man" becoming "men" and "child" becoming "children."
When it comes to forming the possessive case for plural nouns, the rules can be slightly different depending on whether the noun is regular or irregular. For regular plurals, you typically add an apostrophe followed by an "s" ('s) to the end of the word. This indicates possession. For example, "the dogs' toys" implies that the toys belong to the dogs.
However, irregular plurals like "children" present a unique situation. The possessive form of "children" is "children's," not "childrens'." This is because "children" is an irregular plural that retains its plural form when made possessive. It's important to note that "children" is both the plural form and the possessive form of "child." This is a quirk of English grammar that learners often find challenging.
Now, let's consider "parents." Since "parents" is a regular plural noun formed by adding an "s" to the singular noun "parent," its possessive form is made by adding an apostrophe after the "s." Therefore, "parents'" is the correct possessive form, indicating that something belongs to the parents collectively.
It's also worth mentioning that possessive nouns can indicate possession in different ways. For example, "John's book" suggests that the book belongs to John, while "a book of John's" could imply one of several books that John owns. The context in which the possessive form is used can change its meaning slightly.
In summary, the possessive form of "children" is "children's," and the possessive form of "parents" is "parents'." These rules reflect the unique grammatical structures of English, where irregular plurals like "children" maintain their plural form when made possessive, and regular plurals like "parents" follow the more straightforward rule of adding an apostrophe and an "s" after the plural form.
Understanding these nuances is crucial for anyone learning English, as they are part of the language's complex and sometimes counterintuitive grammatical system. It's always beneficial to study these rules in context and to practice using them in a variety of sentences to solidify your understanding.


2024-05-13 04:51:58

Benjamin Martin

Works at the World Health Organization, Lives in Geneva, Switzerland.
Children is an irregular plural, not a regular one. Therefore, the suffix is 's , and the possessive form is children's. ... Parents is a regular plural, so the possessive suffix is simply ' . That means parents' is correct.Sep 20, 2013
2023-06-15 00:06:32

Ava Davis

QuesHub.com delivers expert answers and knowledge to you.
Children is an irregular plural, not a regular one. Therefore, the suffix is 's , and the possessive form is children's. ... Parents is a regular plural, so the possessive suffix is simply ' . That means parents' is correct.Sep 20, 2013
ask:3,asku:1,askr:137,askz:21,askd:152,RedisW:0askR:3,askD:0 mz:hit,askU:0,askT:0askA:4